After violence around protests on October 17, the French government asked the country’s four main telecom operators to prepare for a temporary block on several social media platforms if further unrest occurred. The measure was not used on October 24, but its preparation signals that restricting communication networks is being considered as a response to demonstrations, sociologist Francesca Musiani writes in a Le Monde opinion article.
Supporters of a shutdown argue that social media can help people coordinate, identify targets and circulate calls to action. But Musiani says it remains to be shown that cutting access would prevent violence without causing significant side effects. The same platforms are also used to share practical information, document police interventions and report danger.
A shutdown would not distinguish between illegal content and legitimate information, or between people planning violence and peaceful demonstrators. It could also cut off useful communication channels for authorities, journalists and emergency services, the article notes.
France has already blocked a platform during unrest. In May 2024, the government ordered TikTok blocked across New Caledonia, citing concerns that content could intensify violence. On April 1, 2025, the Conseil d’État ruled that a total interruption, without a precisely defined duration or consideration of less restrictive options, disproportionately infringed freedom of expression, communication and access to information. The court said alternatives, including blocking particular features, should be considered.
The ruling, Musiani argues, is not approval for broad platform shutdowns. It highlights the limits of measures that affect all uses of a service, rather than targeting specific unlawful activity.
Sources: Le Monde Politique.